In the complex world of machine learning, there's one overlooked detail that can dramatically affect outcomes, choosing the right baseline for feature attribution methods. As entrepreneurs, we constantly seek insights to optimize decisions, improve strategies, and forecast risks. Machine learning, when done right, offers these benefits. But dive beneath the surface and you'll find that even seemingly trivial choices like baselines can skew results, potentially misleading your strategies.
Choosing a baseline isn't just about convenience; it's about how you're interpreting "absence" of data within your model. For example, when we want to understand which features influence a neural network's prediction, say, in customer recommendation models, the baseline acts as a "point zero." It's the data you compare your input against. Something as simple as using an all-black image to define "absence" in image models, for instance, can completely distort what your algorithm highlights as important. Let’s explore how this plays out in practice.
What Makes Baselines Crucial in Interpretability?
Machine learning algorithms generate predictions through hundreds, or even thousands, of layers. To dig into these predictions, methods like Integrated Gradients calculate how much each input feature contributed to the outcome. These contributions aren't abstract; they're visualized to make insights actionable for business owners like us.
But here's where it gets tricky: the value of these visual explanations hinges on the baseline. If you select poorly, you’re essentially giving incorrect weight to features. For example, a poorly chosen baseline in visual models can outright miss critical factors like edges or contrast differences. That means the insights you base your product pivots, process automation, or customer personalization on could be wrong.
Let’s make it more relatable: imagine you’re analyzing churn data to shape retention tactics. If your model compares customers against a baseline representing only inactive users (rather than averaging data across the active and inactive groups), the conclusion will inevitably lean toward activities exclusive to inactivity.
Common Types of Baselines and Their Flaws
Different use cases demand different approaches to defining baseline inputs. Let’s unpack the most common ones:
-
Constant Value (e.g., All-Black Image):
This is the easiest to implement but often the least insightful. In image-related tasks, it assumes black pixels hold no information, ignoring how your model interprets shading or shadows. For businesses analyzing product imagery, this can omit details critical for optimization, such as product texture. -
Blurred or Averaged Input:
By leveraging a blurred version or averaged dataset, you're approximating "missingness" while preserving structural integrity. It's a better choice for physical-object detection startups working on, say, drones or autonomous vehicles. -
Random Noise Distributions:
Some data scientists inject randomness to simulate a feature-agnostic baseline. But random noise might not align well with natural distributions. If, for example, you're exploring consumer preferences in high-dimensional models, randomness here could artificially inflate certain biases. -
Dataset-Derived Samples:
Best for robust calculations. It compares predictions to an input sampled from your training set, ensuring results remain rooted in reality. For an e-commerce founder, this translates to far more reliable insights into customer trends.
How Can Entrepreneurs Apply This to Their Startups?
As a founder, it’s easy to delegate technical parameters to your data science team, but this doesn't mean you're disconnected from the impact these decisions have. Here's an action plan to use smarter interpretability techniques and reduce guesswork in your data-driven strategies.
-
Consult Your Team About the Baselines:
Insist that data scientists communicate what baseline they’re using in their attribution calculations, especially for decisions impacting revenue or customer targeting. -
Focus on Business-Centered Metrics:
Avoid choosing baselines arbitrarily simply because they "work technically." Ask how the baseline aligns with your business realities, for example, whether your inactive-user-retention model reflects actual dormancy patterns. -
Test Across Multiple Baselines:
Much like A/B testing, attribution baselines should also be verified for reliability. If you’re managing product iterations, insights drawn from multiple contrasting "absences" could reveal new opportunities. -
Demand Visual Confirmations:
Insist on interpretations that come with heatmaps or similar visual indicators to connect abstract figures with real-world phenomena. Tools like Distill's feature attribution explainer excel in breaking down complex data visually.
What to Avoid
Not everything about navigating baselines is intuitive. As a founder who's dealt with countless numbers and variables, here are the most common pitfalls I’ve observed in working with AI-driven tools:
- Trusting Single-Pass Interpretations: Most models rely on one baseline, and this can make results brittle. Rely instead on methods employing multiple or averaged baselines.
- Assuming Default Parameters Are Right: Frequently pre-set options in platforms aren't tailored for your specific business problem. Always question initial settings with real case examples.
- Oversimplified Metrics: A fancy heatmap isn’t inherently useful. Ensure your team explains why certain features are highlighted and how this can influence your decision-making.
Final Thoughts on Taking Control of Models
If I had one key takeaway from researching baselines, it would be this: simplicity doesn’t mean accuracy. If your machine learning insights don’t reflect actual business behavior, tools that were supposed to help you make smarter choices could lead you astray.
Implementing feature-attribution techniques, even if indirectly, allows you to hold your team accountable for building smarter systems. Most importantly, transparently aligning technology choices with business goals safeguards both your time and funds from costly missteps.
Digging deeper into attribution baselines, this discussion board has excellent user-centric anecdotes from practitioners. As this field continually evolves, don't shy away from leaning into resources that challenge the status quo.
Success stories emerge when founders balance technical curiosity with business acumen. Maintain both perspectives, you’ll be ahead by default.
FAQ
1. Why is baseline selection important in machine learning?
Baseline selection defines what is considered "absence" of data. A poorly chosen baseline can distort model interpretations and lead to misleading insights. Read Visualizing the Impact of Feature Attribution Baselines
2. What are common types of baselines used?
Common types include constant value (e.g., all-black images), blurred inputs, random noise distributions, and dataset-derived samples. Each has unique flaws and applications based on use cases. Learn more about baseline types
3. Are there alternatives to constant baselines in feature attribution?
Yes, alternatives like blurred inputs, random noise, and averaged dataset-derived samples can reduce deficiencies seen in constant baselines. Explore different baseline alternatives
4. How can entrepreneurs apply baseline selection insights?
Entrepreneurs should collaborate with data teams to ensure baselines align with business contexts. Testing multiple baselines and visualizing outcomes are essential for accurate insights. Discover how to integrate smarter techniques
5. What metrics can evaluate feature attribution baselines?
Metrics like top-k ablation, mass-center ablation, and fidelity tests assess how well baselines identify truly impactful features. Learn about evaluation methods
6. How do blurred baselines perform compared to random noise?
Blurred baselines better preserve structural integrity while representing “missingness,” making them ideal for vision models. Random noise, while agnostic, can introduce artificial biases. Compare blurred versus random baselines
7. What are Expected Gradients and their relation to baselines?
Expected Gradients generalizes Integrated Gradients by averaging attributions across a distribution of baselines for robustness. Learn more about Expected Gradients
8. What pitfalls should be avoided in baseline selection?
Avoid trusting single-pass interpretations, assuming default parameters are correct, and oversimplified metrics without thorough validation. Learn about common pitfalls
9. Can distribution-based baselines outperform constant baselines?
Yes, baselines derived from training data distributions maintain reality alignment and provide reliable feature attributions than constant standards like an all-black image. Understand distribution-based baselines
10. How can visual interpretability tools help validate baselines?
Tools like heatmaps or enhanced feature-attribution visualizers connect abstract data explanations to real-world phenomena for better decision-making. Explore visual tools on Distill
About the Author
Violetta Bonenkamp, also known as MeanCEO, is an experienced startup founder with an impressive educational background including an MBA and four other higher education degrees. She has over 20 years of work experience across multiple countries, including 5 years as a solopreneur and serial entrepreneur. Throughout her startup experience she has applied for multiple startup grants at the EU level, in the Netherlands and Malta, and her startups received quite a few of those. She’s been living, studying and working in many countries around the globe and her extensive multicultural experience has influenced her immensely.
Violetta Bonenkamp's expertise in CAD sector, IP protection and blockchain
Violetta Bonenkamp is recognized as a multidisciplinary expert with significant achievements in the CAD sector, intellectual property (IP) protection, and blockchain technology.
CAD Sector:
- Violetta is the CEO and co-founder of CADChain, a deep tech startup focused on developing IP management software specifically for CAD (Computer-Aided Design) data. CADChain addresses the lack of industry standards for CAD data protection and sharing, using innovative technology to secure and manage design data.
- She has led the company since its inception in 2018, overseeing R&D, PR, and business development, and driving the creation of products for platforms such as Autodesk Inventor, Blender, and SolidWorks.
- Her leadership has been instrumental in scaling CADChain from a small team to a significant player in the deeptech space, with a diverse, international team.
IP Protection:
- Violetta has built deep expertise in intellectual property, combining academic training with practical startup experience. She has taken specialized courses in IP from institutions like WIPO and the EU IPO.
- She is known for sharing actionable strategies for startup IP protection, leveraging both legal and technological approaches, and has published guides and content on this topic for the entrepreneurial community.
- Her work at CADChain directly addresses the need for robust IP protection in the engineering and design industries, integrating cybersecurity and compliance measures to safeguard digital assets.
Blockchain:
- Violetta’s entry into the blockchain sector began with the founding of CADChain, which uses blockchain as a core technology for securing and managing CAD data.
- She holds several certifications in blockchain and has participated in major hackathons and policy forums, such as the OECD Global Blockchain Policy Forum.
- Her expertise extends to applying blockchain for IP management, ensuring data integrity, traceability, and secure sharing in the CAD industry.
Violetta is a true multiple specialist who has built expertise in Linguistics, Education, Business Management, Blockchain, Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, Game Design, AI, SEO, Digital Marketing, cyber security and zero code automations. Her extensive educational journey includes a Master of Arts in Linguistics and Education, an Advanced Master in Linguistics from Belgium (2006-2007), an MBA from Blekinge Institute of Technology in Sweden (2006-2008), and an Erasmus Mundus joint program European Master of Higher Education from universities in Norway, Finland, and Portugal (2009).
She is the founder of Fe/male Switch, a startup game that encourages women to enter STEM fields, and also leads CADChain, and multiple other projects like the Directory of 1,000 Startup Cities with a proprietary MeanCEO Index that ranks cities for female entrepreneurs. Violetta created the "gamepreneurship" methodology, which forms the scientific basis of her startup game. She also builds a lot of SEO tools for startups. Her achievements include being named one of the top 100 women in Europe by EU Startups in 2022 and being nominated for Impact Person of the year at the Dutch Blockchain Week. She is an author with Sifted and a speaker at different Universities. Recently she published a book on Startup Idea Validation the right way: from zero to first customers and beyond, launched a Directory of 1,500+ websites for startups to list themselves in order to gain traction and build backlinks and is building MELA AI to help local restaurants in Malta get more visibility online.
For the past several years Violetta has been living between the Netherlands and Malta, while also regularly traveling to different destinations around the globe, usually due to her entrepreneurial activities. This has led her to start writing about different locations and amenities from the POV of an entrepreneur. Here’s her recent article about the best hotels in Italy to work from.